Today is one of our longer ones, but it could save you thousands of dollars in legal fees. So please digest all of it, and pass the message on to others. This is Day 147 in the countdown to the Founding Fathers March, sponsored by the Parenting Rights Institute and National League of Fathers. Inc. Today we honor the grandparents of America. Without them we would not be here. This is a central theme of my introduction to our march published on Day 156. Parenting is an inalienable right which runs back in time over countless generations to make possible the civilization we enjoy today.
Grandparent interests are also a subject of my test cases which seek to get government out of the “child business” as one Family Court put it. The case Troxel v Granville, 530 US 57, 75, 100-102 (2000) represents the last time our Supreme Court addressed the parenting right, repeatedly described as the “oldest liberty interest” protected by the Constitution. It was a grandparent rights case divided into six conflicting opinions with Judge Scalia as the lone dissent arguing that no such right exists. As relevant here, the court declared that drawn out custody litigation could become sufficiently burdensome as a violation of the Constitution.
Since I became involved in the parenting rights movement and what I call the last bastion of institutional discrimination left un-remedied in America today (prejudice upon fathers in domestic relations courts), I note with dismay that the majority of our responders continue to be women. There are certainly various reasons to explain this, but the one that I think most prevalent is the damage which these “custody” and “support” laws are producing upon the very same gender which promoted them.
This is easily seen in the second wives, girlfriends and family members called upon to pay for the cost of litigation and money obligations which are cranked out of these courts for the benefit of third parties. Among the goals in one of our cases pending at a middle level appeals court is to secure a study and remedy from New York’s Unified Court System behind the vast amounts of monies diverted from the child to pay for court battles concocted by lawyers using fraudulent claims, inflamed issues and an utter exploitation of the laws of nature, see i.e. yesterday’s commitment of Judge Martha Walsh-Hood.
One illustration, magnified by millions of others across America, is sufficient for purposes of today’s dedication. A grandmother approaching the age of 70 contacted me in response to our Thanksgiving post and next day “Shopping with Martha on Black Friday”. Distraught over the condition that she found her son and grandchildren, she sought my assistance. Due to the lack of significant contributions to our Parenting Rights Institute, however, I could not travel to her location, file a helpful amicus brief, or appear in court as an expert. Nevertheless, I did my best to explain our reform efforts and March on Washington.
She related a heart wrenching story so familiar to the thousands I have studied over the years. Her son was denied holiday time with his children. Therefore, she was similarly injured as a grandparent. But this was only the beginning of her pain and suffering. She had shelled out more than $30,000 in legal fees for her son’s divorce and custody battles, putting up her home in the process to get a loan. Now he was facing a court order to pay another $30,000 for the ex spouse’s lawyer while the son tried to make ends meet paying so-called “child support”. You should familiarize yourself with this particular fraud elsewhere on our site.
The situation was obviously untenable, and the judge presiding over this fiasco could care less about the injuries he was logically inflicting upon extended family members. The woman’s son would soon be doing time in a debtors’ prison if these obligations were not satisfied. Indeed that is how this “custodial institution of childrearing” was designed to work behind closed doors. A giant gold mine was envisioned by the people who drafted amendments to the federal Child Support Standards Act during the nineties.
Now put your common sense hat on, I explained to this wonderful, loving grandmother. If you could resurrect those debtor prisons, ruled unconstitutional 200 years ago, the threat of six months in the slammer for a non-criminal act would cause mainstream American to give up literally billions of dollars to lawyers, politicians and forensic feeders of a dysfunctional childrearing system. These socialist feeders include psychiatrists, law guardians, evaluators, anger management “experts”, and the newest one which combines insanity and audacity in the twilight zone, the so-called “Parent Education Class”.
Keep that hat on now, Ms. Robinson, as I give you more logic. Unequal laws are inherently unjust. That’s not me saying it. Our Founding Fathers did, and you’ll find it in the Constitution. But when money becomes the subject, such inconvenient principles are simply phased out with propaganda, in this case the state acting in our children’s so-called “best interests”, see also Mein Kampf, by Adolph Hitler. Just think about that broad standard for a minute. Even a half baked lawyer could come up with something to make a “best interest” argument.
Meanwhile the unsuspecting client is led to believe that something intellectual is occurring in these courts. A favorite case citation of mine is Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY 2d 727 (1996) where New York’s high court compared a custody relocation case to a nursery rhyme character. It callously blamed the pieces of a broken marriage upon the parents but never addressed how the court process pushed “Humpty Dumpty” off the wall. By keeping things unbalanced and oppressive, like we did slavery and women in the day, it keeps litigants coming in search of justice which cannot be provided. Very simply, you get hamsters in a cage, entertaining second rate lawyers and the public.
Under current law, you have guaranteed losers on both sides of any case with children often turned into rudderless zombies, particularly after the “professionals” arrive with their bag of experimental chemicals. The state mandated fight over one’s own offspring will logically produce unconventional behavior, and then the judge, pretending to be ashamed and shocked at the parents’ immaturity, now remands the whole nuclear family for costly counseling. If Hitler had such audacity, we would be living today in Nazi America. It’s a goldmine that even he never envisioned.
So what’s the answer, Mr. Koziol, asked the grandmother. My best suggestion in reply was that she help me find a way to fund this mission of reform, our Parenting Rights Institute and the Founding Fathers March. $10, $20 and $50 contributions are certainly helpful, but this is not the kind of commitment which can take on a multi-billion dollar child industry. If the $60,000 in combined fees spent on her son’s case were applied to this cause, given the personal sacrifices already made, I could have secured the kind of reform that would have made her holidays more pleasant. I could hear her on the home computer as she began looking for donors along with a farewell statement to the effect that those lawyers “did nothing” for her.
3 thoughts on “DAY 147: Dedicated to America’s Grandparents”
WLYB………To add insult to injury, Florida Chapter 39 Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure and Section …child placed in the custody of DCF Grandparents rights may continue and encourage and are lawfully entailed to 3 hour per week while the parent is in jail for murder, rape and / or other henis crime. While on the other hand a non custodial parent never convicted of any crime that in fact that grandparent has no rights to the grandchild while custody proceedings are undergoing. In my case has been going on for years without any visitation or meaningful relationship with the grandchild. Grandparents of a murderer, rapist, sex offender has more rights than a Grandparent father never convicted of a crime. That is our Corrupt Family Court here in the Twelfth Circuit Court Manatee County, check it out if you like.
Go to MANATEECLERK.COM
Go to Court Records
click on “I Accept for Subscription Access”
user name ggibellina
click on case number enter 2002DR3254
726 entries, 4500+ pages of documents, 10 years to get equal time with my daughter
Open to the Public, Good information and case law, hope it helps you if you need it.
Please sign my petition go to web page causes Dismantle Corrupt Family Courts
I thank you and my 10 year old daughter will thank you when she see’s me, it’s been over 2 years since I have seen my daughter.
Therefore, until the day I die, I am going to do what I can, regardless of the cost to me, to try to stop this awful corruption that is destroying our beloved democracy.
John Jay Hooker
Leon you have really hit the nail on the head here about the current system of judicial process and how men face inequality every day in Divorce court and Custody hearings.
In a broad sense, it could be said history is repeating itself?
Consider in 1848 there was a convention of women and men, who penned “the Declaration of Sentiments”, which was a foundation for women’s rights in our country. In summary, they said women had been oppressed long enough in the work place, in family responsibilities, in church, and most important to them at this time was the “right to vote”.
A couple of the resolutions they proposed stated: “Resolved, that the same amount of virtue, delicacy, and refinement of behavior that is required of woman in the social state also be required of man, and the same transgressions should be visited with equal severity on both man and woman.
Read more: The Declaration of Sentiments — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0875901.html#ixzz1ey3ZqYVE
Resolved, that the speedy success of our cause depends upon the zealous and untiring efforts of both men and women for the overthrow of the monopoly of the pulpit, and for the securing to woman an equal participation with men in the various trades, professions, and commerce.
Read more: The Declaration of Sentiments — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0875901.html#ixzz1ey7n0PNY
OK so what is my point here….. Women have in the last 200 years “come a long way baby”! (Remember the Virginia Slims cigarette commercials”) In my opinion, men have come a long way too! Many of us “guys” may not admit it when we are at the gym with our buddies, but we have become domesticated, we enjoy caring for our kids, going to softball practice, working from home, changing diapers, reading bedtime stories, being a stay at home dad (I mean domestic engineer), helping with homework, having tea time with our daughters, and playing baseball with our sons.
But all this doesn’t matter unless we are “zealous and untiring in our efforts”.
Mr Leon, thank you for your pursuit of bringing justice to this legitimate social movement for men, their right to be treated equally in divorce courts and custody hearings, to be accepted equally as nurturing caregivers, and most importantly to be accepted as equally capable of parenting and meeting the best interests of our children!
One last word from me, in that “Declaration of Sentiments” I mentioned earlier, Elizabeth Stanton wrote this resolution: “That woman is man’s equal, was intended to be so by the Creator, and the highest good of the race demands that she should be recognized as such.”. Now is the time we fathers must act to achieve the highest good of our society, and much like these early women’s rights advocates, we men must take action to be recognized as equally capable as parents to our children.
Read more: The Declaration of Sentiments — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0875901.html#ixzz1eyCrDYjy
Again thank you Leon!
Thank you. Your response will be shared with Leon.