News Alert today calls for united promotion: Please help

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

Another unarmed black man shot dead by a white traffic cop

Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

Former civil rights trial attorney

Another unarmed black man was shot dead by a white traffic cop. It occurred in Alexandria, Louisiana by a white patrolman who stopped Derrick Kittling, 45, for a tinted window and muffler violation. Renowned civil rights attorney, Benjamin Crump, has already been retained by the victim’s family.

The latest tragedy is uniquely reminiscent of the 2015 murder of unarmed black man, Walter Scott, in South Carolina resulting in a prison term for that traffic cop.

The Walter Scott murder is among the most horrific in modern times because it involved no criminal charges, only a civil debt known as child support that was causing support warrants and recurring jail terms which the delinquent dad was fleeing.

This father of three was stopped for a broken tail light before the warrant surfaced, leading to the dad’s flight from the scene and shooting five times in the back. Had the killing not been caught on a smart phone by a concealed third party, it would have been covered up as the falsified police report initially proved.

However, the event is often omitted from media summaries and Black Lives Matter reports because it corroborates the lucrative and scandal-ridden support collection bureaucracy together with its draconian enforcement practices.

I addressed national media, local Congressman James Clyburn and civil rights leaders at Scott’s funeral to redirect the cause to child support corruption and not racial targeting (as Scott’s pastor also emphasized).

But nothing came of it as the band plays on….

Educate yourself to the realities of this epidemic at http://www.leonkoziol.com

JUDGE DEPRAVITY IN THE FATAL THOMAS VALVA CUSTODY CASE IS MORE RAMPANT THAN YOU KNOW

LEON R. KOZIOL, J.D.

PARENTING RIGHTS INSTITUTE
CITIZEN COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION, INC.

BASED ON THREE DECADES AS A TRIAL ATTORNEY IN BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS, I CAN ATTEST TO THE HUMAN TRAGEDIES AND MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE. THE THOMAS VALVA TRAGEDY IS EXEMPLARY AND SHOULD MOTIVATE CONCERNED CITIZENS TO ACTION.

IT CORROBORATES COUNTLESS MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS WHICH IN NEW YORK AND CALIFORNIA AT LEAST ARE INVESTIGATED ONLY 10% OF THE TIME.

WHEN WILL OUR “THOMAS PAINE” ADVOCATES FINALLY JOIN RANKS TO ROOT OUT THIS CORRUPTION IN THE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT HELD TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF IMPARTIALITY AND TRUST?

READ THE SHOCKING ARTICLE IN THE FEBRUARY 2, 2020 EDITION OF THE NEW YORK POST. THEN SCROLL DOWN TO ALL THE RELEVANT WHISTLEBLOWER POSTS AT WWW.LEONKOZIOL.COM AND SUPPORT OUR CAUSE.

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

An American Tragedy morphs into a Story for the Ages

Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

Parenting Rights Institute

Citizen Commission Against Corruption, Inc.

When I first set out to expose the corruption that was genuinely occurring in my initially uncontested divorce, I never imagined it would lead to my whistleblower escape to Paris. I never imagined that my case would eventually be assigned to a child custody judge who would incur a permanent ban from the bench for his admission to sexual abuse of his handicapped, five-year-old niece. I never anticipated forty trial level jurists assigned after so many were disqualified for bias due to my exposures.

But as I persisted in my crusade to vindicate rights protected by our Constitution, I soon realized that I had stumbled into quicksand with no exit opportunity offered to me by a growing contingent of adversaries having the sadistic power to literally end my life. Indeed, on December 23, 2020, I was admitted to the emergency room for a dire condition triggered by overwhelming persecution.

As my book, Whistleblower in Paris explains, it’s not like they all met in some clandestine fashion, but as intelligent operators, they knew that a relentless assault on my livelihood, professional reputation and father-daughter relationships over a fifteen-year period would result in serious health impairments. My ordeal bore startling parallels to the persecution of Chinese civil rights attorney, Chen Guangchen, who is presently residing in New York to escape recurring arrests in his native country.

Child support warrants were repeatedly issued for my arrest in violation of my rights of due process, equal protection and free speech exercised outside the courtroom. These were issued despite the removal of all means of generating income. Proceedings in family courts have no jury safeguards, and the lesser standards of proof enable judges to abuse their authority to issue false findings. In many cases, they do this to punish those who simply hurt their feelings.

But when I managed to evade ego-driven confinement in a debtor prison (while violent convicts were being favored by early release or cashless bail), the persecution was continued with a violent arrest at a sobriety checkpoint. On July 31, 2020, I was assaulted by New York State Police when my background was uncovered at the scene. There was no basis for this assault as the charges were thrown out after I passed a breath test with no traffic violations to support prosecution. However, I was transported to an emergency room where internal affairs opened an investigation. 

Despite the injuries to a public figure, no news release was issued, public access to the scene was not allowed, no internal affairs report was disclosed, and no body cameras were employed contrary to law put into effect one month earlier in response to the George Floyd murder. Weeks later, in the same city, a black arrestee was kicked repeatedly by a police officer resulting in a civil rights conviction against that officer in federal court on January 25, 2022. In my case, the civil rights claims remain pending.

A comparison of the body camera footage made public by the city mayor and the falsified incident report issued by the state police revealed that unlike the black victim arrested for attempted assault of a girlfriend, the white male victim made no bodily threats to anyone, did not yell out a constant barrage of racial slurs, gave no volatile resistance, and was not charged with any violation of law prior to entry into the prearranged checkpoint.  

Both victims made reference to the George Floyd incident when describing their mistreatment, but I was a well-known attorney for more than twenty years who successfully prosecuted civil rights cases including a $300,000 recovery against the local Sheriff’s Department. I owned no guns or criminal record but was viciously targeted due to my exposure of human rights violations and funding abuses in divorce and family courts beginning in 2008. Two years later, my law licenses were suspended.

At present, I am seeking a qualified film producer to expose this highly censored “story for the ages.” Feel free to help promote it by contacting me directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com or (315) 796-4000.

The band plays on as scammers emerge by the day after defrauding citizens without timely oversight

LEON R. KOZIOL, J.D.

CITIZEN COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION. INC

MED TECH SCAMMER ELIZABETH HOLMES WAS SENTENCED YESTERDAY TO 11 YEARS IN FEDERAL PRISON AFTER SHE WAS FOUND GUILTY TWO MONTHS AGO OF DEFRAUDING INVESTORS OF HER THERANOS FIRM OUT OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. IT WAS A LONG TIME IN COMING CONSIDERING HER $9 BILLION STATED WORTH WAS REVISED OVERNIGHT TO ZERO BY FORBES IN 2015.

MEANWHILE, ALLEN WEISSELBERG, DONALD TRUMP’S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (TRUMP ORGANIZATION), WAS SPILLING HIS GUTS ON A WITNESS STAND IN NEW YORK REGARDING MASSIVE TAX FRAUDS AND “COOKING (TWO SETS) OF BOOKS).” THIS TESTIMONY COMES AS PART OF A PLEA DEAL IN AUGUST WHERE HE WAS CONVICTED OF 15 FELONIES COMMITTED DURING THE COURSE OF HIS DECADES-LONG CAREER.

CELEBRITY ATTORNEY MICHAEL AVENATI, PROMOTED BY MEDIA AT ONE TIME AS A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT, IS NOW SERVING A FOUR-YEAR PRISON TERM FOR THEFT OF CLIENT MONIES BELONGING TO STORMY DANIELS WITH ANOTHER FOUR MONTHS ADDED FOR EXTORTION OF NIKE. OTHER CLIENT VICTIMS ARE THE SUBJECT OF ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL MATTERS STILL PENDING WHICH COULD RESULT, FOR ALL INTENTS, IN A LIFE SENTENCE.

HARVEY WEISTEIN IS CURRENTLY ON TRIAL FOR MULTIPLE RAPE AND CHILD SEX ABUSE CHARGES WHILE SERVING A 23-YEAR PRISON TERM FOR FELONY RAPE CONVICTIONS IN AN EARLIER CASE. A LONG TIME FILM PRODUCER AND FOUNDER OF MIRAMAX AND WEINSTEIN FILMS, HE EVADED ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DECADES LEADING TO THE “ME-TOO” MOVEMENT. HIS EXPLOITS IMPLICATE PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND CELEBRITIES.

PAUL MANAFORTE, DONALD TRUMP’S FORMER CAMPAIGN MANAGER, WAS SENTENCED TO 47 MONTHS IN PRISON WITH ANOTHER 43 MONTHS ADDED SHORTLY AFTERWARD FOR TAX FRAUD, CONSPIRACY AND BANK FRAUD IN 2019. HE WAS PARDONED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP DAYS BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE IN 2020, THIS SCAMMER WAS A LONG TIME LOBBIEST DURING PRIOR DECADES OF PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATIONS.

FORMER TRUMP PERSONAL ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN RECENTLY COMPLETED A PRISON TERM ON MULTIPLE FELONY CONVICTIONS CONNECTED TO HIS WORK FOR THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION. HE WAS ACCUSED OF BRIBING PORN STAR STORMY DANIELS TO PROTECT HIS CLIENT’S RUN FOR PRESIDENT. HE HAS SINCE TAKEN REVENGE AGAINST TRUMP WITH DUBIOUS TESTIMONY AT A CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT HEARING.

AND THE LIST GOES ON:

AS REPORTED HERE IN MULTIPLE POSTS AND MY BLOG SITE http://www.leonkoziol.com, THE LATEST CORRUPTION FEATURES 30-YEAR-OLD PONZI SCAMMER SAM BANKMAN-FRIED WHO DONATED MILLIONS IN INVESTOR FUNDS TO DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS. LIKE ELIZABETH HOLMES AND BERNIE MADOFF, HIS CRYPTO-CURRENCY EXCHANGE FIRM FTX COLLAPSED AFTER AN OVERNIGHT REDUCTION OF ASSET WORTH FROM $16 BILLION TO ZERO, LEAVING COUNTLESS VICTIMS WITHOUT RECOURSE FOR THE LOSS OF LIFELONG SAVINGS.,

WITH HUNTER BIDEN FINALLY UNDER SCRUTINY BY A NEW REPUBLICAN HOUSE MAJORITY, THIS IS ONLY THE TIP OF AN ICEBERG THAT WILL DO MUCH MORE THAN DRAIN A SWAMP, EVEN TRUMP’S SWAMP. IT IS DESTINED TO SINK CAPITOL HILL, SENDING OUR COUNTRY INTO AN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL, TAILSPIN, POTENTIAL NUCLEAR WAR, AND RAMPANT CRIME CAUSING CITIZENS TO QUESTION THEIR ADHERENCE TO OUR LAWS. IT WILL INCITE MORE RIOTS AND REVOLUTIONARY TRENDS.

TO COUNTER SUCH TRENDS, A NONPROFIT CITIZEN ACTION GROUP WAS FORMED IN 2021 KNOWN AS THE CITIZEN COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION,, INC. ITS PURPOSE IS TO INVESTIGATE NEGLECTED COMPLAINTS, FILE LAWSUITS FOR VICTIMS, AND DO THE JOB WHICH OVERSIGHT AGENCIES ARE NOT. SUPPORT OUR CAUSE FOR PRESERVING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AIDING UNPROTECTED WHISTLEBLOWERS AND INFORMING THE PUBLIC OF CENSORED NEWS ITEMS.

SPREAD THE WORD AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE, OR CALL OUR OFFICE AT (315) 864-8176.

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

Tom Brady, Gisele Bundchen and Larry David among those named in a lawsuit today against Ponzi scammer Sam Bankman-Fried, implicating congressional leaders

LEON R. KOZIOL, J.D.

CITIZEN COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION, INC.

BREAKING NEWS FOR INVESTORS AND FAMILY COURT VICTIMS:

A FEDERAL LAWSUIT WAS ANNOUNCED TODAY AGAINST NFL QUARTERBACK TOM BRADY, SUPERMODEL GISELE BUNDCHEN AND COMEDIAN LARRY DAVID, AMONG OTHER CELEBRITIES, WHO PROMOTED THE NOW SENSATIONAL $16 BILLION PONZI SCHEME CARRIED OUT BY 30-YEAR-OLD SAM BANKMAN-FRIED.

THE FALL-OUT FROM THIS GARGANTUAN FRAUD IS ONLY BEGINNING, BUT ALL AMERICANS ARE HARMED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, AND SHOULD PAY HEED TO THE ISSUES OF FAILED REGULATIONS, OFFICIAL IMMUNITIES AND AGENCY OVERSIGHT.

THIS IS BECAUSE YOU MAY ALREADY BE AN UNKNOWING VICTIM.

EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT, TAXPAYERS MIGHT BE CALLED UPON TO BAIL OUT THE INVESTORS WRONGFULLY DEFRAUDED DUE TO GOVERNMENT COMPLICITY IN THIS UNPRECEDENTED POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL SCANDAL.

AS REVELATIONS CONTINUE TO UNFOLD SHOWING THAT DEMOCRAT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ACCEPTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM BANKMAN-FRIED, THE TIP OF THIS ICEBERG MAY DRAIN MUCH MORE THAN A SWAMP, IT MAY SINK CAPITOL HILL ITSELF.

THE NEWLY ANNOUNCED, PROPOSED CLASS ACTION MAY BE EXPANDED EVENTUALLY TO INCLUDE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, RIVALING THE CAMP LEJEUNE CLAIMS.

MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ENJOY LEGISLATIVE AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY WHILE ENGAGED IN OFFICIAL BUSINESS BUT MAY BE STRIPPED OF SUCH PROTECTIONS IF A COURT FINDS THEY WERE ACTING OUTSIDE THEIR SCOPE OF OFFICE, i.e. PRIVATE INVESTING.

IN MY OWN EXPERIENCE AS A HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL LITIGATOR FOR MORE THAN 23-YEARS (BEFORE I WAS TARGETED AS A JUDICIAL WHISTLEBLOWER), I FILED A SIMILAR PROPOSED CLASS ACTION.

ITS GOAL, AMONG OTHERS, WAS TO REMOVE VARIOUS IMMUNITIES THAT PREVENTED PARENTS VICTIMIZED BY DRACONIAN SUPPORT COLLECTION TACTICS AND PARENTAL ALIENATION FROM SEEKING REDRESS IN OUR FEDERAL COURTS.

SUCH IMMUNITIES WERE RAISED BY THOSE WHO HAVE UNDULY INTERFERED WITH OUR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF PARENTING, ONE THAT OUR SUPREME COURT HAS REPEATEDLY DECLARED TO BE “THE OLDEST LIBERTY INTEREST PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.”

THE NUMBERS ENGAGED IN THAT INTERFERENCE WERE GROWING BY THE DAY, REQUIRING ME TO NAME A WIDE RANGE OF DEFENDANTS TO MAKE THAT POINT. THESE WERE PERSONS AND ENTITIES EFFECTIVELY SUBSTITUTING AS PARENTS.

CHECK OUT THE RESULTING 46-PAGE DECISION AT:

PARENT V STATE, 786 F. SUPP. 2D 516 (NDNY 2011).

THIS WAS ALSO A CONSOLIDATED ACTION ULTIMATELY DISMISSED DUE TO ITS BROAD IMPLICATIONS AND INFLUENCE OF THE MANY NAMED DEFENDANTS.

IF YOU ARE NOT MOVED BY ANY OF THIS, DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND LEARN THE OBSTACLES TO PRO SE LAWSUITS SEEKING MAJOR PRECEDENT AT http://www.leonkoziol.com.

INDEED, THE FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAM KNOWN AS TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, WHICH REWARDS JUDGES BY THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF SUPPORT ORDERS SATISFIED BY THE STATES, MAY ITSELF BE A PONZI SCHEME.

SO DON’T JUST SCROLL PAST THIS POST BEFORE READING IT IN FULL.

A NONPROFIT ACTION GROUP HAS RECENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED TO DO THE JOB THAT OVERSIGHT AGENCIES ARE NOT. CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE AT: http://www.citizencommissionagainstcorruption.org.

LEND US YOUR SUPPORT AND SPREAD THE WORD.

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

Congressional Leaders Are Already Dodging the Bankman-Fried Ponzi Scandal and the stolen money donated to Democrat candidates

Dr. Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

Citizen Commission Against Corruption, Inc.

The ranking Democrat member of the House Financial Services Committee, California Congresswoman Maxine Waters, is already dodging important questions from reporters on breaking news of a massive Ponzi scheme carried out by Sam Bankman-Fried, a trader in worthless crypto currency, which was never made known by Wall Street regulators.

Instead, this unprecedented scandal was exposed by a competitor, leading to shocking revelations that a 30-year-old scammer used investor monies to the tune of millions for donations to Democrat candidates. In the same manner that Bernie Madoff stole more than $65 billion from his investors, this is how Bankman-Fried hopes to dodge criminal liability, and it begs the question, how much more would the latter have stolen if not for the fortuitous revenge exacted by this competitor.

Fortunately, Bahama authorities have temporarily blocked Bankman-Fried’s clandestine effort to move his collapsed businesses to Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE) which has no extradition treaty with the United States. In reality, with U.S. authorities lagging on this vast crime spree, it buys time for Bankman-Fried to lobby for other modes of underworld immunity.

To be sure, while mainstream media continue to interview this con-artist for juicy details, the con-artist continues to patronize them with disclosures that he is occupied with video games during the emerging crisis. Indeed the New York Times published an interview which made it all look like a bad business decision. That article ignored the “elephant in the courtroom” which questions how any legitimate business enterprise could amass $32 billion in stated assets in such a short period. This is where Joe Biden’s 87,000 newly hired IRS agents should be assigned as opposed to small-time middle class.

The entire catastrophe leads to the inescapable conclusion that all of Washington is in some manner engaged in corruption and cover-ups until exposed by outside victims.

It would be nearly comical if not for the millions of dollars stolen from a wide range of unsuspecting investors who will never see their life savings restored. In a matter of days, reported assets of Bankman-Fried fell from $16 billion (yes, that’s billions with a “B”) to zero. This comes after the boy-scammer amassed twice that much while in his twenties. The question now becomes, will these Democrat beneficiaries return that donated money to innocent constituents or will they choose to cover up what may be the greatest financial-political scandal in American history?

This scandal should incite all Americans to get up in arms. Instead, law-abiding citizens have allowed themselves to become “deer in the headlights,” considered “stupid” and easily duped. Ominously, such con-artists are growing in number by the day to infect communities across the country. Indeed, even former president Bill Clinton fell for this scammer’s hollow investment promises.

Unfortunately, whistleblowers everywhere charged with a duty to uphold self-governing principles of our Constitution will instead remain timid by-standers more engrossed with such distractions as Tic-Toc, Amazon shopping and assorted social exchanges on the internet. So much for alternate accountability through secondary media and “citizen journalism.”

But there is hope. A concerned group has established a nonprofit organization known as the Citizen Commission Against Corruption, Inc. Through its timely creation in 2021, a trustworthy commitment has been made to set up offices and qualified staff across the country to investigate neglected complaints and hold wrongdoers duly accountable.

To make this patriotic commitment a reality, however, financial support is needed Check out the relevant website at http://www.citizencommissionagainstcorruption.org. You can also contact this author directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com or (315) 796-4000 for more information.

Spread the word!

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

While activists chastise Dave Chappelle for his SNL comedy monologue, Sam Bankman-Fried gets a softball feature on his $16 billion Ponzi scandal

Dr. Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

Citizen Commission Against Corruption, Inc.

Antisemitism activists were quick to condemn long time comedian Dave Chappelle for his SNL monologue this week, one that referenced Kanye West and Kyrie Irving. Meanwhile the New York Times did a softball story on breaking news of a $16 billion Ponzi scandal committed by 29-year-old crypto currency mastermind Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).

According to the New York Post, at least one top financial regulator, Sheila Bair, compared the SBF scandal to the $65 billion Ponzi scheme of Bernie Madoff. But the latter was carried out over a period of years while the current one was completed virtually overnight. In a matter of days, reported assets of FTX, Bankman-Fried’s exchange firm, fell from $16 billion to zero leaving investors without recourse.

It would be expected that regulators learned a lesson from the 2008 Madoff tragedy with greatly improved oversight. Madoff succeeded by courting both sides of the aisle as chairman of NASDAQ and trader of fraudulent holdings. SBF did the same by using other people’s money in worthless crypto investments to make campaign donations to Democrats. Also, like Madoff, greed ruled the process when SBF targeted his main competitor, Changpeng Zhao and his exchange firm Binance. That set off an announced withdrawal of SBF-FTX investments by Zhao that led to the collapse.

The New York Times endeavored to frame this catastrophe as a bad business move, but that slant collapsed just as quickly when news of SBFs attempts to move his failed enterprise to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, (UAE) was made known. That country is one of the few that has no extradition treaty with the United States. Much more telling was the lack of accountability regarding the $16 billion void in reported assets as regulators swarmed to a futile rescue of defrauded victims.

The shock which spread across the nation in 2008 regarding the comparable void in Madoff assets was met with a front-page analysis in the Wall Street Journal that depicted Madoff as “the Jewish connection.” Indeed, Bernie Madoff betrayed no moral fiber as he stole from Jewish and Gentile investors alike. Most contemptable was his audacity to swindle Jewish charity groups and research institutions. Even at Madoff’s death behind bars, there were no sources to reimburse such victims.

So history now repeats itself with the protege learning the chicanery of his virtual mentor to achieve the glitz popularized in the blockbuster film, Wall Street. But once again, this is no fictional work by Stephen King. It’s a real-life American tragedy that ruined entire lives. Such tragedies could be averted with reliable protections for whistleblowers, however, that utopian world is sabotaged by those who profit from free speech abuses. Reporters duly qualified to expose these catastrophes are subjugated and even exiled by the beneficiaries of these trillion-dollar industries that employ highly influential special interests and lobby groups.

The censorship has now extended to comedy such as that displayed by Dave Chappelle this past weekend. A viewing of his tip-toe monologue reveals nothing earth-shattering. Nevertheless, it managed to elicit oversensitive reactions to the kind of humor championed by Lewis Black, Lenny Bruce, Chris Rock and George Carlin. Like cancel culture, our First Amendment values have been steadily eroded to facilitate that new world order of mind control. Anything that fails to conform with the views of this ordered society is demeaned as stupid, terrorizing and otherwise removable from any town square platform.

The question then becomes, who is the idyllic referee to rule upon acceptable and offensive speech? And what standards can be agreed upon that would permit the kind of quotes attributed to Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson to make our rights possible in the first place? An example of today’s misguided nature of public discourse is the pompous commentary of Charles Barkley reacting to the ongoing suspension of NBA superstar Kyrie Irving:

Appearing Monday on CNN This Morning, the vocal TNT analyst (Charles Barkley) said the Brooklyn Nets “rightfully” suspended the point guard, who posted (a) link to an antisemitic film on Twitter.

“People have the right to feel and say what they want to,” Barkley said. “We have freedom of speech, but there are repercussions when you say certain things.”

Barkley believes people are trying to get away with saying terrible things by using freedom of speech as a defense.

“This thing with free speech has really gotten out of hand,” he added. “You can’t go around insulting people and think it’s OK just because it’s freedom of speech.”

When asked about “cancel culture,” Barkley said he doesn’t like seeing people losing their jobs. However, he noted that few people truly get “canceled” and said someone should “be called to the carpet” when saying something offensive.

“You should be called out if you said something stupid. Hey, I’ve been called out many times. I have no problem with that.”

Two weeks ago, Barkley said the NBA “dropped the ball” by not suspending Irving. He lamented that the TNT crew was “talking about this idiot” instead of basketball.

Author Leon Koziol, J.D.

Dr. Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who practiced law for more than two decades in federal and state courts. He appeared on the CBS program 60 Minutes for his defense of landowners targeted for eviction by native-American tribes alleging violations of ancient treaties. As an upstate New York city corporation counsel, he secured a federal court verdict invalidating a mayoral gag order.

Relevant case citations include, Koziol v Hanna, 107 F.2d 170 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir.2004); Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY); Peterman v Pataki, 2004 NY Slip Op 51092(U) and Parent v State, 786 F. Supp. 2d 516 (NDNY 2011).

The latter was a consolidated case intended as a class action on behalf of victimized parents in divorce and family courts. It was part of the author’s bold challenge to judicial and sovereign immunity which led to severe retributions upon his law licenses and parent-child relationships. The horrific ordeal which led to a near death climax in 2020 was captured in his book, Whistleblower in Paris, published in 2021.

Dr. Koziol can be contacted directly at leonkoziol@gmail.com and (315) 796-4000.

Karens of the Corn: How Many Have You Met?

Dr. Leon R. Koziol, J.D.

Parenting Rights Institute

You’ll find them everywhere: “Karens” posing as substitute parents dictating how we should raise our children. They lurk, often in disguise, among our schools, neighborhoods and most harmfully, our family courts. It is a recent phenomenon defying centuries of human tradition and successful child rearing to a point of utter chaos in today’s society.

The true parents are finally awakening to this phenomenon, registering vocal complaints at school board meetings against woke mandates, creationist prohibitions, and the growing fixations with gender reassignments. They are challenging the resulting displacements of the most basic learning skills expected by a moral majority of taxpaying citizens.

The trending chaos is largely sourced in an antiquated child control doctrine carried over from feudal England known as Parens Patriae. Its continued utility as “the law” of domestic relations is leading to a parentless society reminiscent of Stephen King’s best-seller, Children of the Corn. Its plot features a cult of children who overtake a rural town by eliminating all parents. A traveling couple then stumbles upon the evil world they have created only to jeopardize their very lives.

The story’s parallel to a new world order being promoted in our public institutions is astounding.

This post is intended to reach those having a spiritual side who might better relate to this parallel. It is not fringe, fantasy or devoid of factual support but based on an inescapable conclusion emerging from an increasingly demonic world. As a lawyer turned author and human rights advocate now focused on exposing corruption in our courts, I have come across horrific events in my travels that cannot be explained in any other logical way.

Take, for example, the countless children scheming to murder their parents for inheritance purposes and the undeniable explosion of mass murders being committed by deranged juveniles. No less demonic, consider 2-year old Gabriella “Gabby” Boyd in White Plains, New York whose mother chose to murder this defenseless child rather than give up custody to a father who successfully exposed her dangerous conduct. The judge failed to act timely, and the mother is now serving a 25-year sentence.

Then there’s Michael Valva, a father who managed to gain custody over his autistic, 8-year old boy over the desperate pleas of a fit mother warning the court that her son would be at great risk as a result. The judge there disregarded those pleas in callous fashion and acted contrary to law by denying a hearing or genuine concern for the child’s “best interests.” Experts and lay persons familiar with this tragedy questioned how such mistreatment could be considered superior to conventional child rearing.

Answers eventually emerged from court transcripts and news reports revealing that this judge, Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, was more ego-driven by the alleged failures of that mother to comply with all her anal directives. The boy, Thomas Valva, died shortly afterward when the father left him in a freezing garage overnight as a form of punishment. That father was quickly fired as an NYPD officer and charged with murder.

Reform efforts have failed to elicit shared parenting doctrines that could reduce or eliminate the custody mandate and its human carnage. Thomas Ball recognized these failures and resorted to the ultimate sacrifice. A war veteran, he was denied access to his daughter based on allegations that he slapped her on one occasion. It subjected him to costly forensic evaluations to a point of futility. He then chose to burn himself alive on the steps of a New Hampshire family court as a form of protest.

A police investigator in Utica, New York facing draconian support enforcement measures chose another form of protest. Alleged to have resorted to domestic violence, he was subjected to protection orders, confiscation of weapons and reassignment of duties. The relentless humiliation became his last straw. He completed a murder-suicide at the marital home using a common kitchen knife. It left four children without parents. Fault had to be placed somewhere in the face of public pressure, so the city settled a wrongful death case for $2 million.

These family court dysfunctions and resulting horrors constitute a tiny fraction of tragedies resulting from a lucrative, tyrannical and antiquated child custody framework. The bulk of misguided decision making remains in a perpetual state of denial or cover-up to protect a trillion-dollar industry at the expense of unrepresented taxpayers, innocent children, disjointed families and subjugated parents. It is no fictional thriller but a barbaric reality reflective of the combatants in a Roman Coliseum.

Indeed, otherwise cooperating parents are ordered to battle for that almighty custody “award” in a public forum. This so-called justice system has only increased needless controversy to a point of forcing one or both parents out of their children’s lives. In social circles such outcomes are lumped into a category of “dead beat” parenting. In psychological terms it has been diagnosed as Parent Alienation Syndrome. In the legal profession, it has been blamed privately on disgruntled clients to justify exorbitant fees, and in politics, it has become a crisis to exploit for taxing purposes.

Despite a century of Supreme Court decisions emphasizing that the natural right of parenting is a fundamental liberty interest protected by the Constitution, and that the state commands no property ownership over our children, the band plays on. Meanwhile, our grand ship as a civilized society continues to sink along with so many others in history that stood idle while demonic possessions invaded their towns and cities.

What do the midterm elections mean for victims of family court corruption?

Dr. Leon Koziol, J.D.

Parenting Rights Institute

As followers of my blog site at http://www.leonkoziol.com know, my 23 unblemished years as a highly successful civil rights attorney was erased along with my parent-child relationships in retaliation for my exposure of court corruption and funding abuses connected to Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. After 12 years of inhuman persecution, this resulted in my hospitalization for a life-threatening condition on December 23, 2020.

Despite a dire prognosis, my daughters have yet to call or visit me two years later as part of a lucrative child custody tactic known as parental alienation. I have never been reported for abuse or neglect even by a spiteful ex-wife and never found to be unfit by any judge. The details of my ordeal are captured in my newly published book, Whistleblower in Paris. A highly informative, expert summary is provided on the book’s website and elsewhere on this blog, but suffice it to say, I’m still here for some fateful reason.

And that leads us to today’s timely post in the wake of midterm elections and the increased gridlock it will bring on the subject of parent-child separations at our borders and in our courts. A great hypocrisy continues to infect this human rights crisis with citizen parents being systematically separated from their children while greater concern is being exhibited for their illegal counterparts. Families have become politicized to avenge the egos of both Democrat and Republican leaders to a point where our very Capitol was invaded by protesters.

Only recently have parents awaken to the realities of a new world order bent on removing parent involvement in our schools. Yet they remain woefully short of the focus needed behind a larger, all-encompassing threat at the core of our constitutional government. I have been exposing this threat since 2010 when I took a public stand against my profession. Unfortunately, apathy ruled the day despite my precedent-seeking-lawsuits, lobbying initiatives in Congress and public rallies that included a 2019 Parent March on Washington down Pennsylvania Avenue under police escort between the Trump White House and Supreme Court.

My girls have long entered colleges that have not been disclosed to me, so none of my continued sacrifices or reform efforts really matter anymore. However current victims in our divorce and family courts remain as “Deer in the Headlights” with unscrupulous lawyers and ego-driven judges exploiting them for their misplaced trust. This crisis is now on the verge of exploding as moms and dads speak out at public meetings. Their impatience is well justified by impotent oversight, whistleblower retributions and leadership changes that effectively conceal unequal treatment.

Doubters need go no further than a high-profile case filed by seventeen (17) states against Donald Trump in 2018 to verify. It sought declaratory and injunctive relief against federal practices that separated illegal immigrants from their children. It represented a back-door way of encouraging more illegal behavior, and we see the harmful impacts today across America. Meanwhile parent-child separations among legal residents were quickly dispensed as tedious squabbles. In my case, for example, the separations were clearly malicious with no regard for collateral victims such as extended family.

The 2018 lawsuit received early attention due to media posturing of a federal judge. An exigent (temporary) order was immediately entered which put a stop to Trump’s separation policies. A venue change was then granted to the Southern District of California where it has languished to the present day. Among other things, the first judge ordered a re-drafting of pleadings to conform with federal rules of procedure regarding basic typeset prior to her transfer order. These pleadings were drafted by high-profile lawyers enjoying top hourly rates and political influence.

It is worth mentioning that many of my own lawsuits seeking identical relief against our family courts suffered no such humiliation on the opening pleadings. My first precedent-seeking case was commenced nine years prior to the Trump filing and, like their lawsuit, was based on both procedural and substantive due process in addition to equal protection violations. My adversaries included the Justice Department, New York Attorney General and similar high-profile law firms.

Two of my lawsuits of similar nature were consolidated, and there was no request or court order to suggest that either was frivolous (unlike some election-denier lawsuits today). However, because I sought to invalidate judicial immunity and open the door for pro se parents to obtain compensation in our federal courts, I was targeted and misrepresented in the lawsuits I was forced to lodge later on.

You can look up my case and its 46-page decision at Parent v State, 786 F.2d 516 (NDNY 2011). It remains astounding that, once again, I have acted with exceptional fortitude, constitutional resolve and litigation experience to anticipate today’s crises and act accordingly, see i.e. Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2nd Cir. 2004)($333,000 civil rights verdict argued before Justice Sonia Sotomayor); Koziol v Hanna, 107 F. Supp. 2d 170 (NDNY 2000)(First Amendment case as city corporation counsel in federal court ultimately successful in removing a mayoral gag order).

My combined skills to benefit human rights victims today have been suspended since Parent v State was litigated. This represents additional collateral damage associated with the retributions as victims struggle to find competent representation. As victims yourselves, you need to get active right now. Avoid the trolls, beneficiaries, laziness and lame excuses, the self-appointed lawyers and voo-doo advice they dispense on the internet. Support our cause, both financially and virally. I cannot do this alone, and frankly, I have no incentive these days to continue.

In the balance hangs our cause of liberty and fundamental parenting rights under the Constitution.

Dr. Leon Koziol, J.D.

(315) 380-3420