Meet Keith “Eis-Incompetent” Eisenhut: A Divorce Lawyer Who Loves Your Money!

 

cartoons

By Dr. Leon Koziol

Parenting Rights Institute

 Keith Eisenhut is a divorce and family court lawyer in Utica, New York. He lives somewhere around a small town called Waterville and makes a living orchestrating needless conflict between moms and dads. If you’ve got lots of money to burn, don’t do it, just throw it in a wheel barrel and deliver it to “Keith’s” sole practice, wherever it is these days, after he was tossed from his last partnership with Mike Kalil.

You see, Keith Eisen-slut has sleezed so much money out of unsuspecting parents that Bernie Madoff would have loved to become his new partner. It’s important, therefore, that we put our local followers on notice about this character so that you won’t get “burned” as well. “Keith” as he is called among these courts has exhibited all sorts of incompetency, but managed to dodge accountability by joining bar associations and even the local ethics committee, if you can believe that.

You might compare Eisen-slut to the chief attorney and deputy lawyers on the ethics committee which did the witch hunt against me years ago when I began exposing such incompetency on this website, local public forums, and both mainstream and social media. I called this New York ethics committee an “unethical ethics committee” during my judicial whistleblowing activity and, of course, they went ballistic on me.

How dare I say such terrible things? Their reputation, like my (eventually admitted) pedophile custody judge, Bryan Hedges, was “beyond reproach.” Not long afterward, however, I was vindicated when these same lawyers, Peter Torncello, Steven Zayas and Elizabeth Devane, were exposed by a state inspector general and allowed to resign by their Albany Appeals Court employers for falsifying their time sheets. These are the standard-bearers of attorney ethics charged with the duty of correcting overbilling practices of characters like Keith Eisen-slut.

Well here at Leon Koziol.com, we don’t let such characters get away with their sleeze tactics. You see “Keith” was my ex-spouse’s first divorce lawyer. I warned her about him but, hey, she knew better as a Frankfort-Schuyler school teacher who once lectured her students that the Nile River flows south (because that’s the way it looked on her geography map). Nevermind all the error-prone resumes I had to correct for her when we were married. She’s still in Frankfort (which she despises) and will probably be there to retirement given her tenured status.

Anyway Kelly Hawse-Koziol found out the hard way before finally firing Eisen-slut. She re-hired him for one more try in 2012 after her replacement lawyer moved to New York City. Again he lost as did his client when the judge denied her request to have me pay for Keith Eisenhut’s lawyer fee. Here are some other features of his incompetent representation after sleezing many more thousands out of this high school teacher (itemized in my recently filed state Supreme Court lawsuit):

(a)   outside disclosures of the father’s private matters resulting in protection orders against Eisenhut, his client and law office on January 11, 2007;

 (b)   filing of papers concededly in “the wrong court” in December, 2006 resulting in dismissal of his client’s case and costly renewal a year later;

(c)   drafting of a divorce decree, corrected by the father, which had his own client guilty of cruel and inhumane treatment contrary to agreement;

 (d)   recklessly delayed and contrived support bills which collapse his client’s 2006 settlement with its voluntary 50% support increase;

 (e)   costly proceedings in 2012 adverse to his client which could have been avoided altogether with a competent review of the case record.

These are only some of Eisenhut’s gross incompetence. All of it is verified by the record for anyone to review. And yet the “bar” is still allowing him to “practice” law. Kelly Hawse-Koziol is now on her sixth or seventh lawyer, and our once uncontested divorce (before Eisen-whore made it contested) is now on its 40th trial level jurist.

After dragging his client through years of needless proceedings for increased “child support,” New York Supreme Court Judge John Grow ruled in his decision of October 8, 2008 that the parents’ private support agreements of 2004 and 2005 were just and proper under the federal and state “Child Support Standards Act.”

So next time someone refers you to Keith Eisennut, bring along your wheel barrel of cash and strap yourself in for the ride of any carnival. Just don’t’ expect any refunds if you fall off the ride. This carnival court clown, Eisen-slut, is easy to recognize. He’ll be the dwarf or troll literally talking through his nose with that nasal thing he’s got going. You might even need to take a course in nasal dialect to understand how he’s going to screw up your life.

If you have any complaint regarding Keith Eisenhut, submit your grievance to:

Attorney Grievance Committee

Fifth Judicial District

224 Harrison Street; Suite 408

Syracuse, New York 13202-3066

You can also call directly at (315) 401-3355

Or better yet, file your grievance and sue Eisenhut for malpractice. I’ve won a number of such cases including one against a lawyer who later became a family court judge. If Kelly Hawse-Koziol had done so (as I once recommended), she would have recovered a lot more than the so-called “child support” she is still seeking today.     

 

 

 

    

PARENTING ALERT: CONVICTED CHIEF JUDGE PROMOTED ON WALLS OF NEW YORK’S HIGH COURT


As we reach the two week mark in our Founding Fathers March on Washington, another protest may be brewing at the courthouse steps of New York’s high court in Albany. It comes in the wake of a formal complaint issued to current Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman by parental advocate Dr. Leon Koziol regarding a political poster featured on the courthouse walls. Convicted criminal and former Chief Judge Sol Wachtler is presently being advertised as a former candidate on the Republican line for judgeship to this same court. For those of you unfamiliar with Mr. Wachtler, he was prosecuted for blackmail, racketeering and stalking a former lover, among other crimes during the nineties, even using court personnel to target a New Jersey lawyer for purposes of impairing his law license.

It all resulted in a guilty plea and federal prison term for Wachtler. Yet our highest court continues to praise him as a man of “integrity” on our public courthouse walls. The complaint underscores the need for parents to be vigilant of their rights and to protect their children from judges themselves. To be sure, Judge Wachtler threatened to kidnap his ex-lover’s child with audacity to send condoms to her 14 year old daughter! You can see why the Parenting Rights Institute and National League of Fathers, Inc. are joining forces with other concerned groups to protest corruption in our courts. Help us by organizing your friends and family in a peaceful demonstration on the west lawn of Senate Park in our nation’s capital on April 20, 2012. Kindly pass this on to others and exploit any media contacts that you may have.

See a copy of the recently filed complaint (Click Here)

National Father’s Day Message and Complaint

TO:          ALL  PARENTING/CHILD  ADVOCATES

FROM:       PARENTING  RIGHTS  INSTITUTE AND NATIONAL  LEAGUE  OF  FATHERS,  INC.

RE:           PARENTING  RIGHTS  CONVENTION  REPORT LITIGATION  UPDATE

DATE:     JUNE 10, 2011

As promised at our national Parenting Rights Convention held in upstate New York on April 15-17, 2011, a Report has now been completed for review by attendees, supporters and various government agencies. Issued in the form of a formal “Complaint” filed this morning with the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct, copies are being furnished to the U.S. Justice Department, United Nations, legislative leaders and various human rights organizations. We expect to complete this process on June 17, 2011 in Washington D.C. (Father’s Day weekend).

A copy of the 25 page “Complaint” is available for viewing at www.leonkoziol.com. Copies are also being sent to our followers. It incorporates the testimony and contributions of those who attended the April convention. However, names and personal details were excluded to protect the participants from retaliation in their private litigation. Instead civil rights advocate Leon Koziol, J.D. employed his own experiences with references and recommendations common to “similarly situated parents”. The Complaint easily shows why reform is not going to occur from within.

This “Complaint” has immense practical value as a free information product for those victimized by domestic relations courts around the country. We parents are experiencing an epidemic in state control practices over our private affairs and exploitation of innocent children for profit. This document should be shared everywhere as a personal defense resource. It can be used to better understand the Family Court environment and as a tool for evaluating the performance of costly legal representation. In addition, it may serve as a background piece for seminars and public assemblies given the complex nature of these court processes. If this Complaint can save a parent-child relationship from abuse or demise, it will be well worth the sacrifice made by its author and sponsor. You may contact Mr. Koziol personally for this purpose at (315) 796-4000.

On a related note, a 45 page opinion was handed down in federal court in a case filed by Leon Koziol on behalf of “parents similarly situated” in “Parent v State” and its consolidated member case “Koziol v Lippman”. Originally filed on February 26, 2009, this challenge to abusive custody and support laws was held up for two years on a court issued ruling which raised the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as a bar to federal court jurisdiction. Younger abstention was also raised, among other obstacles, by the many law firms defending this action.

Although the claims were dismissed, the jurisdiction obstacles were overcome. Unlike countless other challenges around the country, this court took jurisdiction over the state court issues, giving others a precedent for accessing federal court to raise constitutional questions. The adverse components of this ruling are now being appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City. A expedited motion for exigent relief will be filed there at the Foley Square courthouse on Friday, June 17, 2011. We will keep you informed as you remain cognizant of the uphill battle we face. To put this in perspective, father’s rights cases feature a 100% failure rate in our nation’s history. Then, in the usual manner, our politicians wonder why we face so much father absence and moral decline in Father’s Day speeches.

 See Complaint: (Click Here)