King’s Chronicles: How Do You Know If Your Judge Is Hiding A Mental Defect?


Judges Are Typically Prosecuted For Deranged Crimes Prior To Motions For Competency Evaluations.

By Dr. Leon R. Koziol

So your judge is acting strange. She’s engaged in social banter with the lawyers, ruling for your adversary in disregard of your evidence, and acting like she knows things about you which are not in the court record. You’re confused, incredulous, maybe even bitter about what’s happening. But there’s nothing you can do because the standards for showing judicial bias are utterly unattainable. A prosecutor has it easier in a criminal case.

Welcome to “King’s Chronicles,” part two of an expose about court corruption which every litigant in America should review. Today we focus on that ever elusive question of bias. If it exists, no amount of preparation, merit or lawyer fees is likely to help you. The outcome has been predetermined and your fate sealed. Worse yet, you may not even know that the misconduct is occurring as the culprit twists your own behavior to suit her decision.

In yesterday’s post, part one, we provided a short list of victims who learned all too late that their presiding judges had suffered from delusional thinking. Not one could be expected to admit to any bias and circumstantial proof, however compelling, is routinely disregarded on appeal. In the “kids for cash” scandal, for example, more than 4,000 juvenile convictions had to be overturned, but how did that help the wrongfully incarcerated kids, their families or the taxpayers? Due process had been tortured beyond repair.

With this backdrop, we bring you a story of a family judge assigned to my custody case after 30 prior trial judges had to be terminated or disqualified, many due to retributions for my public criticisms. It is an ordeal that reads like a John Grisham story but you may find your own experiences familiar. You can also gain valuable insights based on 23 years of trial experience here or give a loved one some consolation by sharing this post.

To put you in my shoes, imagine being in front of a new family judge facing yet another petition from a scorned ex-spouse to have your children taken from you. Prior petitions have been thrown out by his predecessors for lack of evidence, but this judge is exploiting the current one because he is offended by your proper criticisms of him, reasons having nothing to do with the merits of this case or your innocent children’s genuine interests.

On a first appearance, the judge has already entered a stigmatizing restriction upon your parenting time based on the one sided story in the petition. That story is just that, no witness, no corroboration, only more hearsay and tired old delusions of the ex-spouse directed against her replacement, your fiancée, living in the former marital home for years.

An astute judge would easily detect the fraud. He certainly would not jump to conclusions and sign an order which impairs a fundamental right protected by our Constitution. But this is family court, things can get very political, and unfortunately we’re also dealing here with a biased judge pretending to see sudden legitimacy to the allegations.

If he bothered to accurately read the record, Judge Daniel King would know of the scorned litigant’s history of court abuse. Instead, he has his own abuse in mind, a petition with an opportunity for him to discredit his public adversary. So when you finally get to be heard for the purpose of removing that stigma, this judge cuts you off and simply declares that he is “protecting” your children.

It’s bad enough that the misguided jurist has trampled all over your due process rights, but these are not his children, he knows nothing about them. He was not there when they were born, knows nothing about the real story, all your sacrifices, love or commitments, and he certainly wasn’t there to save one of them altogether when you pulled her back from darting out into traffic at a playground.

But so what, this is Dan King, suddenly a supreme being. He’s a judge for Pete’s sake, he wears a robe and people all rise when he enters “his” courtroom. He’s read chapter and verse about his “legal” authority to protect children from their own parents. He can do a lot with such an awesome and overbroad power. There’s no jury here, the lawyers are all making money over the asinine petitions, and who’s going to believe an angry litigant over a judge anyway?

What’s more, that logical human emotion called anger can be exploited to impose more conditions such as costly anger management sessions. It occurs all the time to benefit third party “experts” who replace your judgments  with theirs in a confusing mesh of opinions that can defy logic. To be sure, failure to display anger at a wrongful seizure of your loved ones is about as normal as Norman Bates at a domestic violence convention.

And so, over a period of only six months, in a pathetically demented agenda of speech retaliation, Judge Daniel King assured that two little girls would never see their daddy again. He imposed a series of absurd or conflicting restrictions which left this author at constant risk of contempt. Accordingly I will not see my girls again, if at all, until they reach a mature age. Even then, I may be foreclosed if the scorned ex-spouse finishes her child alienation schemes which were utterly disregarded.

It is an injustice of immense proportion occurring undetected among family courts all across America today. In a self- regulated environment, judicial commissions overlook such misconduct because orchestrated conflicts are lucrative for lawyers, therapists and judges looking to advance themselves with political contributions.

When this newly elected family judge referenced himself to my ex-spouse as “Dan King” in a later teleconference, it provided further proof of his bias. Under the judicial ethics code, a judge is expected to avoid any appearance of partiality or impropriety.  Yet this story gets even more shocking. But you’ll have to await part three of our continuing series entitled “King’s Chronicles.”

Dr.  Leon R. Koziol

Civil Rights Advocate

(315) 796-4000

Administrator’s Note: This week we came upon an interesting website called the Oswego County Peeled Onion. Ironically, their observations about Dan King’s courtroom behavior are eerily similar despite never having had a prior discussion with their staff:

Please share this link with others:

Should Family Judge Dan King be Ordered For Comprehensive Mental Evaluations?

Dan King

Think About it. Where Does a Parent  Go to Assure a Judge is “Normal?”

By Dr. Leon R. Koziol

Welcome to “King’s Chronicles,” part one. In yesterday’s post, we brought you a series of cases involving the removal of deranged people from the bench which reads like a docket sheet in any criminal court. Given their secretive and brazen nature, we also posed the question of how many similar cases may be out there which will never be discovered because this epidemic is not being taken seriously.

To reiterate, a New York Chief Justice was imprisoned for stalking, extortion and lodging false reports to authorities, a Syracuse family judge admitted to sexual misconduct upon his five year old handicapped niece, a Michigan judge was exposed for sexual relations in chambers with a litigant during a child support case, a Texas family judge was caught on video beating his minor daughter, and two Pennsylvania judges were imprisoned for the now infamous  “kids for cash” bribery scandal which required the reversal of 4,000 juvenile convictions.

These are only a small fraction of the known cases and clearly not minor incidents. Many involved psychotic episodes carried out over an extended period under a pretext of judicial immunity. While committing crimes in high office, the same judges were holding the rest of us to contrasting standards in their decisions. New York’s Chief Justice went so far as to profit from his deranged behavior by authoring a book upon his release from prison entitled “After the Madness.”

Such crimes are distinct from all others in society because they undermine the core of our justice system. As parents we are charged with a duty of protecting our children even against those in robes who purport to look out for their “best interests.” As concerned citizens, we must be vigilant to this crisis because the wrong-doers have been clothed with an awesome government power to discredit whistle- blowers and kill our messengers of reform. And they do it through an abuse of judicial office.

To be sure, this species of misconduct is by far the most dangerous to a free society. It is the worse kind of evil, and that brings us to a junior family judge who recently became elected near the Canadian border. After a brief stint as public defender, Dan King was assigned to cases all across central New York including my custody case. The record featured more than 30 disqualified or removed judges prior to his arrival only six months after being elected in another county by less than 300 votes of 11,000 cast.

I have maintained that Dan King’s assignment was exploited to censor my public criticisms through decisions impairing my parent-child relations. Since July, 2013, he has imposed conflicting restrictions and went so far as to violate a higher court order in a scheme to induce contempt by ambush. He has helped fabricate college degrees as a means for imputing income for support incarceration purposes, he has manufactured absurd prohibitions such as “alcohol related gestures” when no significant parenting issues could be found and, among many other abuses, he threatened to remove me from an entire courthouse if another objection was made to narrative testimony of a scorned ex- spouse.

As a court transcript corroborates, Dan King made this threat despite two of five granted objections at the outset of a custody trial. And he did it for the ulterior purpose of facilitating a false record to support pretrial orders that had no sound basis other than retaliation. Dan King was simply seeking to justify his ego at the expense of innocent children, my little girls.

Concededly it gets personal, but a good father makes it that way when his babies are threatened. If we can’t save our children from official abuse, how do we expect to protect them from the evils outside our court system? And what kind of example do we set for democracy and future generations? As a follower of this site, brace yourself for what you are about to read. It will all be found in upcoming posts under the heading “King’s Chronicles.”

These chronicles present a shocking expose on how easily a judge can get utterly out of control in his quest to avenge valid public criticisms. Our posts, taken together, will comprise a formal complaint to New York’s Judicial Conduct Commission, yes the same one which has ignored so many other valid complaints from plain folks. Its political and window dressing nature caused me to ask for its dissolution in testimony before the Moreland Commission on Public Corruption.

Interestingly, other Dan King victims have come forward to promote a major protest in front of King’s Court in Lowville, New York. Such an event can spark a long overdue wave of protests across America. Tomorrow we will explain why we are referring to this man as “Dan King” and not some dignified title such as judge or “the honorable.”

Dr. Leon R. Koziol

Civil Rights Advocate

(315) 796-4000


Administrator’s Note: What others are saying about Dan King

Please share this link with others: