The following message was published today on the Divorce Coro website, BASE CAMP:
To all victims of court corruption:
Periodically I’ve been checking commentary on this Base Camp since Dr. Joe Sorge created it after the great reform conference he hosted in Washington DC in November 2014. I could not risk disbarment by sponsoring a workshop there due to a suspension (gag) order, and Joe opened the three day event with public disclosure of the witch hunt against me and another New York attorney.
On the last day I threw caution to wind and gave a complimentary rendition of the conference which drew a standing ovation. I’m still fighting this record 9 year suspension because I refuse to surrender my rights and
whistleblower activity. Plus, they seized my children without any unfit parenting or CPS report of any kind which made it personal.
Only yesterday I had to reply to another anonymous lawyer complaint made through a third party regarding statements I made at a town board meeting. I was seeking to open public access to a state owned lake in my home county, and it upset an elite group of property owners engaged in a lawsuit to protect their shoreline sanctuary. The complaint was made to intimidate a whistleblower of corruption even in a non-legal setting.
Imagine that? How bad does it get with these lawyers bent on protecting their gold mine? They will suppress public opinion and accountability to such extremes that their own clients will now suffer escalating conflict and court costs, all for lawyer profit. Family courts do the same to parents who struggle to make sense of child alienation and debtor prisons. Such calculated attacks also lead to censorship of the good people here.
But as much as I support you as a reform group, trust when I say there’s some really crazy stuff being discussed on this site. Maybe it’s good therapy but you could do yourselves a favor by helping me organize a rally on the Supreme Court steps this spring. Victims can present their cases in summary fashion to be recorded and spread virally with or without mainstream media coverage. Imagine your judge or lawyer being exposed nationally in this manner!
We can present for as long as it takes, like an “occupy court” mission, so that our nation’s high court can finally direct administrative and substantive accountability and reform. Without a unified national event, these lawyers and judges you all complain about see no problem with business as usual, and it’s only getting worse. I’m a man of action, not words, as my ten year ordeal proves (to the point of life threatening sacrifice not unlike Nancy Schaefer).
Details at www.leonkoziol.com.
FYI: David Ring has made some outstanding contributions here recently which triggered my first comment on Base Camp today.
Good luck to all.
Dr. Leon Koziol
Parenting Rights Institute. New York.
CHECK OUT OUR INSTITUTE WEBSITE TODAY: http://www.parentingrightsinstitute.com
By Dr. Leon R. Koziol
Parenting Rights Institute
Today, Deputy Clerk of New York’s Fourth Appellate Department, Alan Ross, reported that Judge Stephen K. Lindley denied my emergency application to see my daughters for the holidays. This came despite yet another disqualified family judge from my ten year ordeal, Daniel King, and the continued retaliation by his replacement, James Eby of Oswego. Both had made similar rulings and are now the subject of this ongoing appeal.
I have never been found to be unfit, never even accused of a crime, never found to have engaged in any domestic violence or harm to my children and a model citizen. My only real “crime” is my exercise of First Amendment rights to criticize our third branch of government while exposing the corruption which is being concealed or patronized there. As my thousands of followers worldwide know, I was unblemished as a civil rights attorney for over 23 years until I took a stand against my profession for all the carnage they inflict upon innocent parents and children for profit in these courts.
Presumably like the 35 trial judges disqualified from my originally uncontested divorce, Judge Lindley believes the latest retribution for my reform efforts will cause me to surrender my American beliefs. The following letter to the Vatican’s ambassador to the United States is one of my responses. And once again, please help us out with a purchase or donation on this site or http://www.parentingrightsinstitute.com.
3339 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington D.C. 20008
Dear Archbishop Pierre:
Recently you had occasion to converse with a friend and fellow advocate, St. John’s University Professor Anthony Pappas, of New York City. He outlined his concerns regarding the divorce industry of America and what it is doing to incite family and personal demise for profit. He asked me to supplement those concerns based on my thirty years of trial experience in these courts, not as a divorce lawyer (I actually had a moral policy against divorce retainers), but as a human rights advocate. I have annexed my most recent report on the alarming aspects of this epidemic.
It may interest you to know that Professor Pappas helped finance my trip to Paris for this purpose in 2014. I shared my work with reform advocates and fellow victims from various countries, many of whom participated in the million strong march to protest the terrorist attack on a newspaper office there. He was moved by a standing ovation I obtained at a family law reform conference weeks earlier in Washington D.C. It was sponsored by Dr. Joseph Sorge of Divorce Corp and featured parental and family advocates from most of our fifty states.
The Roman Catholic Church has taken on some very worthy causes here in America, but I will strenuously maintain that none is as critical as this one simply because it is at the root of so many others. The Church has been deceived or influenced to think that divorcing parents are incurring just punishments for their departure from bonds of matrimony. Alternatively, as Professor Pappas reports, the lack of activism is based on jurisdictional boundaries, archaic practices or diplomacy, precisely the factors which nurture the true evil that is lurking here.
The divorce industry has exploited Professor Pappas to the tune of $2 million in lawyer fees over the course of an endless divorce commenced by his ex-spouse in 2004. There were only adult children implicated, hence no custody or support issues. Yet the industry managed to persecute him for his public reform efforts to a level I am not at liberty to disclose here. In my case, it was much worse. My children were alienated without cause, and I was persecuted on all fronts to a point of seeking asylum in your native country. I survived only because of my genetics and faith in God. My dad survived five years in a Nazi concentration camp. My suffering pales in comparison.
It was a similar theme for a Jewish friend and another fellow advocate, Dr. Eric Braverman of Tribecca, Manhattan. In 2015, he asked me to monitor corruption in his courts where child custody issues enabled my profession to extort over $5 million in fees. His story was featured in the New York Post. It was a typical one for those who advocate for long overdue reforms to this industry. Its beneficiaries and predators destroy the public messenger through orchestrated retributions ranging from professional licensure to child deprivations. It is a process that would make any tyrant or underworld figure envious.
Tony is a dedicated parishioner of the Greek Orthodox diocese, and I had the pleasure of meeting Father Alex Karloutsos, his pastor, at the rectory in Manhattan. We were joined by Reverend James A. Forbes of Riverside Church in lower Manhattan (American Baptist and United Church of Christ) who has been called the Martin Luther King of New York. He actually concluded after our session that this fateful opposition to my profession had a much higher purpose (which I have yet to know or achieve). That brings me to you. My fervent hope is that you can influence a moral movement to prevent the human carnage which is occurring here, particularly to innocent children and future generations. My report details this silent epidemic.
I have copied a number of people relevant to this subject, including Special Counsel to Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, and transition team member, Juan Pablo Andrade. I have discussed matters in support of Mr. Trump both before and after his election victory on the phone and submitted my report to both in the past few weeks. I firmly believe that Donald Trump provides a rare and profound hope for making parents great again, the bedrock of a great America. I would be happy to discuss the matter further with you in person upon completing your review of the attached document.
Dr. Leon R. Koziol
Parenting Rights Institute
P.O. Box 8302
Utica, NY 13505
A lucrative child control industry has emerged in America’s divorce and family courts, inflicting moral, educational and productivity declines among our cities, towns and villages. It has made us the most litigious nation in the world as we spend our valuable time and energies on court contests instead of more constructive pursuits.
It’s one thing when the fight concerns products or property but quite another when innocent children are exploited. As parents bound by laws of nature, we cannot remain idle in this escalating crisis while lawyers, bureaucrats and “experts” profit at our children’s expense. How many little ones will never see a good education or career in today’s competitive global market because their parents squandered life’s savings on endless court battles?
It’s not all our fault despite what many judges claim. They know privately that needless court battles are ended only because the money runs out. In the meantime, they could care less that our children or families suffer. Outdated custody doctrine is vigorously retained over shared parenting because unequal classifications beget controversy which, in turn, justifies state intervention. It is a crisis created by socialist-liberals who made the policy case long ago that government is better suited to raise our children.
Hillary Clinton made the same case against both moms and dads in her 90s era book, “It Takes a Village.” Her propaganda sounded good at the time because children were used as a pretext for big government, but it resulted in further erosion of parental authority, leaving minors free to set their own standards of behavior. Almost anything a parent does today to correct a child can be the subject of an agency inquiry, school report or custody impairment.
In plain terms, Hillary’s village works like this: get the people of a community gossiping about their neighbors’ private affairs. Convince them to report objectionable styles of parenting to authorities. Once under a court’s jurisdiction, these fit parents can be conformed to an elusive standard for lawyers to argue and profit over. It goes on all the time in divorce and family courts with “parent education” programs and court ordered evaluations.
This is our latest series regarding court corruption entitled “Kendra’s Chronicles.” Here we provide you with real life injuries caused by socialist policies injected into family litigation. Judges overwhelmed by their “super-parent” roles and overcrowded dockets issue orders based on scripted testimony or lawyer summaries having little regard for the human tragedies they produce. It can easily become a “turn ’em and burn ’em” enterprise.
In “King’s Chronicles” we showed you how a new family judge named Daniel King of Lowville, New York abused state power in retaliation for Dr. Leon Koziol’s public criticisms and reform testimony before the Moreland Commission on Public Corruption. His criticisms included King’s fabricated college degree, parenting conditions in violation of a higher court order and impositions which placed his critic (Koziol) under risk of contempt by ambush.
Ultimately two innocent children were denied access to a fit and loving father for a period of 456 days and counting. This human rights atrocity committed upon Dr. Koziol was orchestrated through absurd parenting conditions added with each public criticism until Leon was forced to abandon his role as a natural father. Here we give you some heart wrenching consequences of Dan King’s egotism in a court which might as well be located in Hillary Clinton’s village.
DADDY, I WANT TO GO THERE!
By Dr. Leon R. Koziol
Author’s note: My daughters’ names have been substituted with “Shelly” the elder and “Debbie” the younger for purposes of this website post. Collectively, and with further editing, this series will comprise a part of my book to be published later this year.
“Daddy, I want to go there!”
It was an uncontrolled scream from a five year old girl which I will never forget as long as I live. Only words, I’ll admit, but they were the world to me coming from my eldest daughter as I opened the front door to our home early one morning. There in the distance was an elaborate playground constructed specially for her and her sister as a father’s day surprise.
The year was 2007, a long time ago, but only if you measure it as a business person. I can recall every detail of Shelly’s facial expressions as she took in something bordering on paradise. Miraculously it had appeared overnight. That was enough for Debbie to exploit the moment, shoving past her older sister into the sunlit yard with a sound that ignited sparrows, robins and blue jays from all surrounding tree limbs. As if on cue, our nearby frog pond erupted with croaking and splash-outs.
Well it worked! All my efforts to make this event a memorable one paid off. You might call it perfect. But you should also know that it was anything but easy. I had to order the apparatus from Georgia and have the area excavated, rearranged and protected by two retaining walls. On one occasion, I rode my girls on a bobcat during a clearing process to give them a sense of participation in this project (with no idea of what was coming). I never disclosed this fact until just now, so don’t report me to their mom.
When the playground components arrived, my contractor went to work (as I did to my law office to pay for it all). After several days, the assembly phase turned into a real mess. The guys could not seem to put everything together properly. I was furious when learning of it outside the courthouse. But that’s where the rescue came in. I was representing an old college friend who I had just gotten out of a real mess of her own without any fee. She owned a ranch and knew a few things usually reserved to men.
Hearing my dilemma, she quickly offered to rectify the errors. With the help of her woman assistant, she completed paradise in time for father’s day. Favors have a way of coming back around. This client will be forever remembered for her rescue as will another very special woman who arrived one year later, about the time when a trampoline was added to the mix. Together we made this place a regular treat for my little girls. These are exciting stories reserved to a later episode in this series.
You might think that a private playground of this caliber meant that my girls would become spoiled. Quite the contrary, they enjoyed the public venues even more. I can still remember Shelly, she couldn’t have been but one or two, dutifully lugging her “Blues Clues” up the ladder with endless repetition before throwing the poor puppy down the slide with a glee that resonated across New Hartford Town Park. And Debbie, running off to the “wilderness” (trail system) which had me split in every direction.
At Lake George, our summer destination, I will never forget a playground near East Cove where the girls enjoyed themselves as much as they did boating and swimming. I don’t believe those outings were eclipsed until many years later when I took both up for their first para-sail adventure. And boy did I hear it from mom in a family court petition after that one! But she was a “custodial parent” by then which changed everything.
I like to think I was different than most dads at these public playgrounds. While they watched or tended to their barbeque grills, I was chasing my girls all across the slides, monkey bars and whatever else was there to exploit. They easily made lots of friends because the other children would simply join in the games I made up to everyone’s delight. Some of the parents knew I was a lawyer and probably figured that our activities were liability-proof, or more likely that I had regressed to my own childhood.
No matter. I didn’t really care. As a “non-custodial parent,” my time was sadistically limited by our courts, so I would be taking full advantage of such moments, knowing they would one day find their way into memories like this one. Although moms seemed to dominate these places, I actually think that playgrounds were constructed with dads in mind. Such fun places resonated deeply within my girls. That much I know.
In practical terms, these playgrounds are all gone now. The one at my home hasn’t been visited in more than a year. But in my mind I can still hear the laughter, the crying, the giggling, whispering, and happy faces, indeed all the things that made them so special in their day.
Yes, playgrounds were a means for overcoming that weekend warrior status accorded to fathers under “the law.” But above all else, they have reserved to another time and place the fact that my girls had a genuine father who loved them, then and now and for eternity.
Dr. Leon R. Koziol
Administrator’s note: Dr. Koziol is offering professional assistance to family members seeking to publish books regarding their own court ordeals, see earlier posts here at Leon Koziol.com for details .
Please share today’s post with others. Here is the link: http://wp.me/pXgi5-QZ