Is Hillary Above the Law? Should We Follow Her “Lead” to Armageddon?

27741787152_3d8e3b21f8_b

By Dr. Leon Koziol

Parenting Rights Institute

From the Whitewater scandal of the nineties to an Arizona tarmac in 2016; Monica Lewinsky in 1998 to the Benghazi hearings of present day, Hillary Clinton has managed to dodge accountability for her crimes time and again.  Meanwhile many around her have been convicted or mysteriously eliminated through death or intimidation. Even her husband, Bill, was impeached, held in contempt and disbarred as a lawyer for perjury after turning our White House into a whore house.

But not Hillary. Her (not our) Attorney General and her (not our) FBI Director violated their public trust by refusing to indict her for misconduct which benefited each politically whereas in other cases it led to resignations and prosecutions, i.e. General Petraeus. The salacious  focus on Donald Trump’s personal life as a private citizen is calculated to deflect attention from Hillary’s horrific scandals as a public office holder at the highest levels. She has only one last “grand jury” to dodge on Election Day, and the world is hers, free of accountability.

So what kind of world will that be? Will it lead to a modern day form of anarchy where the people defend their own crimes and misconduct by citing our first woman president as “precedent?” Is this the kind of president women will be remembered for? Shouldn’t we wait four years? With all the liberal focus on women, did Hillary’s New World Order somehow “terminate” the other half of the human population? Will our children now belong to her “Village” in a complete state take-over as it did to education? How will that help women?

Is it also true as she testified before Congress that “it really didn’t matter” how soldiers died in Benghazi? Will military and law enforcement respect and honor the directives of a “leader” who holds herself above the law without remorse or respect for “men?” Did you ever hear an apology from Hillary on anything? Is she a god in her own mind, the Anti-Christ, the Masih ad-Dajjal or the Armilus of Christian, Islamic and Jewish faiths? Is she a combination of these evil beings who will bring our world to an end or Armageddon?

Perhaps you’ve already asked yourself such questions. Surely it’s on the minds of countless voters. They watched in horror as Hillary Clinton made her way up the political ladder with that bizarre laugh, steroid-level deceit, psychotic look and cruelty beyond conscience. What’s really behind it? Who are the players in her New World Order? How did she manage to trump Trump’s billions in this campaign? Why such a liberal piling-on to get her elected at all costs? Why are our First, Second and Fourth Amendments being viciously suppressed and targeted for extinction? Are you truly aware of our times?

This “Anti-Christ” has been defined as the “single figure of concentrated evil.” It may be an entity we are not meant to recognize, an evil so hidden that its host may not even know it. Originating in the Bible and depicted in religious lore as the ultimate opponent of Jesus Christ, it has parallel figures in Islamic and Jewish religions. This evil adversary brings about Armageddon or the end of humanity as we know it.

Recent documentaries have described how the Anti-Christ is now among us given our capacity to end the world through a nuclear holocaust. Scholars have predicted the end when world conflict centers on the holy land of three major religions. If you watched the presidential debates, isn’t that already happening? Iran versus Israel with nuclear powers taking sides?

We’ve now seen civil wars or nuclear threats in Iran, Israel, Syria, Afghanistan, Gaza, Egypt and Libya. The entire Middle East has become consumed by world politics due to the meddling of Hillary and her liberal-socialists. Perhaps it’s time to move to the Southern Hemisphere before radiation rules the north. Think about it. What targets are down under? Why are so many millionaires moving there?

After the last debate, British news reported the largest movement of military by the Russian government since World War II. Photos showed a new Russian missile with the name “Satan II” imprinted on its side capable of destroying Britain twice over. It was the Russian-Soviets who detonated the largest nuclear device in history known as “Tsar Bomba.” And that was in 1961!  They were the first to put a satellite into orbit.

So is this a government to provoke through escalating involvement by our former Secretary of State in countries around the world? Under her influence in administrations over three decades, American military pressure has arrived at the Russian border with Ukraine. If they respond in Cuba or Mexico, what would happen? Is this the kind of “experience” we need from a power broker committed to long discredited socialist policy for child rearing?” If you think family court is a nightmare today, you won’t want to see how she reforms it.

Even if such a Cuba type response is unlikely, it cannot be denied that we are already in a virtual war with Russia in Syria. A single air clash could provoke an unstoppable wave of escalating retributions in the Israel-Arab world. We would be “terminated” before Donald Trump could deny the latest foolish accusations in his campaign. He wisely wants to pull back from the Middle East as Obama once promised. Is it such a bad thing to have good relations with the only other country capable of ending our world? Not Hillary. She has a world to save, or is the word “conquer?”

The Anti-Christ and Armageddon were central themes in the 1997 blockbuster movie, Devil’s Advocate, starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves. The latter is a successful attorney who never lost a criminal jury case until he discovers his success was influenced by his father, Pacino, the devil itself. He becomes disbarred in the end upon rejecting Pacino and his army of demon lawyers. He openly declined further representation of his guilty client, a bragging child molester. Sound familiar on this site?

So even though the media and electoral college have already dictated your vote, you must be marked and monitored through birth numbers, cell phones, satellites and registrations. Satan’s ultimate deceit in this climactic election may be this: Humanity was expecting a man figure to emerge as the Anti-Christ, but it came in the form of a woman. GOTCHA !

product_thumbnail.php
In this 2014 novel available at Barnes and Noble and other major booksellers, Dr. Leon Koziol applies his political, professional and voyaging experience on the Great Lakes to depict how nuclear terrorism can be executed.

Weekend Update: The Contagion of Government Lying


Administrator’s Message: Dr. Koziol continues to take a break from New York’s dysfunctional divorce and family court system as he relaxes in the pristine surroundings of New York’s spectacular Lake George and Saratoga regions.

It may be a long holiday weekend, however, it’s time to get off your butts as Dr. Leon Koziol will be arguing a case against father discrimination, court corruption and parental alienation on June 22, 2016 at the Oneida County Courthouse in Utica, New York. A rally is planned for 10:00 AM sharp!

This is your opportunity to be heard or stop your bitching!

The Contagion of Government Lying

“Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” — Justice Louis Brandeis (1856-1941)

Last week, this column chronicled the startling admissions of lying by White House senior adviser Ben Rhodes. Rhodes readily acknowledged to The New York Times that he lied to the public and to members of Congress during the negotiations that produced the recent Iranian nuclear deal so as to temper the “irrational” fear that some senators and representatives had of the mullahs who run the government in Iran.

He was asked — not subpoenaed — to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about his lying, and he refused to show up, claiming his lies were protected by executive privilege. Because he spoke publicly about this, he has no privilege, yet nothing further happened. The committee gave up the ghost.

Also last week, in a federal court in Brownsville, Texas, the government was caught lying again — this time by a federal judge. Here is the back story.

In 2012, President Barack Obama issued numerous executive orders directing the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to enforce a version of immigration law that the president himself had scripted after Congress declined to pass it.

The president crafted a path to permanent residence in the United States for undocumented immigrants who are the parents of children who were born here or are otherwise residents lawfully.

The president’s plan would add between 4 million and 5 million people as lawful residents. That would add to the financial burdens of the states where these folks reside, because they are required by federal law to provide a social safety net — health care, education, safety, welfare — to all legal residents.

Hence, 26 states sued the federal government, arguing in effect that the president exceeded his constitutional powers when he issued his executive orders and that the immediate effect of their enforcement would be massive, unplanned, unfunded financial burdens on the states.

A federal judge agreed with the states and enjoined the president from enforcing his orders. During the course of the oral arguments in the case, the judge asked the lawyers from the Department of Justice who were representing the president whether the programs his executive orders established had yet begun. The lawyers replied that they had not.

On three more occasions, one orally in the same public courtroom and twice in written submissions to the court, the DOJ lawyers insisted that the president’s programs had not yet begun. In reliance upon those assertions, the states asked only for an injunction going forward, not for an injunction on any applications being processed by the feds, because they were told that none existed. The government lawyers lied.

Last week, we learned that the Department of Homeland Security has surreptitiously accepted applications from more than 100,000 undocumented immigrants for permanent residence under the terms of President Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders.

The orders may be characterized as unconstitutional because the same federal judge to whom the DOJ lawyers lied, as well as a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to which the DOJ appealed the injunction against the president, found them so. Those findings await a determination by the Supreme Court, which is expected by the end of next month.

The problem of lawyers lying to judges is extremely serious. Our system of litigation — lawyers present facts and argue about laws, and judges rely on the truthfulness of what the lawyers have told them — is built on trust. Because lawyers know the facts in their cases more intimately than judges do, judges rely on lawyers to tell them the truth.

At first, these DOJ lawyers lied. Then they lied about their lying. Then they reluctantly acknowledged that they had momentary lapses in understanding, an argument that the court rejected because of the repeated nature of their lying. The lawyers said the programs had not begun, when in fact they had — to a large degree.

The judge’s response in the case was curious. He ordered the DOJ lawyers to take ethics classes. I would have done differently. Lying to the court is so severe a violation of the ethical rules, so disruptive of the moral order, that its significance is diminished by the so-called cure of ethics classes.

I would have barred all lawyers who lied to me from ever appearing in my courtroom, and I would have removed them from the case. I would also have referred what I knew about them to ethics prosecutors in the states and federal districts where they are admitted.

Lawyers have an obligation of candor to the judges before whom they appear. That duty is no less serious when the lawyers work for the government than when they work for private clients.

Because the government prosecutes people who lie to it and its liars almost never can be prosecuted, government lying is grave. It is equivalent to government lawbreaking because when people to whom the government lies — judges or litigants or members of Congress or the public — rely on those lies, they often do so to their detriment. They lose a right or an opportunity that often cannot be recaptured.

I have often asked rhetorically whether the government works for us or we work for the government. The answer to this inquiry is obvious. It is only a fiction that the government works for us.

Yet fear of the consequences of government lying should terrify anyone who believes in the rule of law and fair play. Those consequences can be as contagious as government lawbreaking.

Please share today’s post: http://wp.me/pXgi5-1M2

Time to enjoy life as Leon and friends are doing here at Blue Water Manor in New York’s Adirondack Mountains. After that, let’s face it, judges or gerbils we’re all food for maggots. Have a great Memorial Day weekend.